Sunday, July 19, 2026

Honors Summer Read 2026: Rules of Engagement

"Auguste Reading to Her Daughter" (1910) by Mary Cassatt

Welcome to the East Central University Honors Program's Enduring Questions website!

If you are enrolled in an Honors Enduring Questions class for the fall semester of 2026 at ECU (EQ1 or EQ3), this website is for you. Read on!

Ten percent of each student's grade in both EQ1 and EQ3 will be based on your responses to the questions raised here.

This website is designed to spark conversation. The sort of conversation we're looking to create with this website is academic in character. Thus, your responses should consist of clear, concise statements of your ideas crafted in standard English (not text-speak!). They should be long enough to convey your thoughts, but short enough for other readers to read and respond to fairly quickly. In short, you don't want your responses to be so long that you monopolize (or kill) the conversation by going on, and on, and on.....(we all know how irritating that can be!).

Obviously, responses should not use profanity. They should be civil and respectful. People do not always agree. Responses can be critical; however, all communication is expected to be courteous and professional. Contributors' positions may be questioned; their character should not.

The objective here is to reflect on some of the issues raised by the text, to connect the reading to your personal experience, and to help first- and second-year Honors students get to know each other better.

When should I begin posting my responses?
As soon as you have begin reading Maggie; or a Man and a Woman Walk into a Bar by Katie Yee. Answer questions after you have read the corresponding chapter (and all preceding chapters), but don't wait until you've read the whole book before you start answering questions. Ideally, you will read the question after you've reached that point in the book and respond at that time. There are some questions that you shouldn't respond to after you're read farther ahead in the book (since you know more than other readers do and your response will be shaped by what comes later).

When is this assignment due?
This writing assignment is designed to be completed before classes begin in August.  Details about where and how to account for and submit your word count total will be provided in class when the semester starts (preview: you will compile your comments into a Google Form survey that will be due after classes begin).

How many questions should I respond to?
We do not expect you to respond to each question, but you should respond to several representing different sections of the book. We hope that by the time all the class has completed the assignment, every question will have at least two responses.

Are there any questions I have to answer?
Yes. There are three:
1) "The Takeaway." Only answer "The Takeaway" when you have finished reading the book. When you answer the Takeaway, you are also testifying that you have read the entire book (you can find a link to "The Takeaway" question in the text below). 

2) "The Tip of the Hat" question (see post below). Your answer to that question will not be a part of your word count. In order to respond to this question, you need to read comments other students have made and take take of those that are most thought-provoking.

3) "An Image." Pay attention to the images that accompany each question set and be prepared to choose one to comment on.

How will you know if I have read the book? Will we be tested on it?
We won't test you. We'll trust you. These questions are not designed to show whether or not someone has read the book. They are designed to enrich your engagement with the book and with other Honors students.

Will you really be able to tell if I haven't read the book?
Some people successfully cheat and lie their way through college, cutting corners and rationalizing dishonorable behavior. You get to decide if you want to be that person. In the process, you'll be determining whether the diploma you're working toward will be just a piece of paper or whether it will actually represent an education.

What happens if get caught either claiming to read the book when I haven't read it or submitting responses that I didn't write myself?
If your answers somehow raise suspicions about whether you've read the book or not, you may get further questions about them from the Honors Director. Academic dishonesty of any kind (including the use of of AI to generate answers and not merely revise them) may result in expulsion from the program and loss of an Honors scholarship. Academic dishonesty becomes a greater temptation the later you wait to start (and finish) this assignment.

How much should I write?
Your responses should add up to a sum total of not less than 750 words.  Don't try to load up all 750 words into one or two comments.  You should also respond to comments left by other readers. And pose questions to other readers. (Check back later to see if anyone has responded to your comments-and respond to their responses.)  All of this writing will count toward your 750-word total.  Students are responsible for keeping track of their word total.  This is not just a writing assignment, though; it's a reading assignment, too.  Every student is responsible for reading every word of the assigned text.

Where do I post my responses?
At the bottom of each question post, you will find a "comment" link. If it has a "0" beside it, that means no one has commented yet; as more people comment, the number will go up. When you're ready to weigh in, click on the "comments" button, read any previous comments, and start writing. Please sign your posts. And use your real name--not a nickname--so we can get to know each other).

More questions?
E-mail us at sbenton@ecok.edu!

Engaging with Maggie

Above: Katie Yee. Photo by Roque Nonini.

In this post, you will find links to questions about Katie Yee's
Maggie; or, a Man and Woman Walk into a Bar. These questions are identified by the pages they refer to in the book.

These questions are designed for you to be able to answer them as you go and not for you to answer after you've read the whole book (although if you've already read the book, you can do it that way).

Once you've started reading the novel, click on the links, read the corresponding questions and comments other readers may have left (click on the "comment" button beneath each post to see them), and then join the discussion (or initiate it).

Don't look at questions that are farther ahead than what you've read.

Many posts have several questions. You may answer any of them you wish. It is not necessary to answer all of them.

Answer the questions you consider to be most thought-provoking rather than those that are simply easiest to answer.

 

There are three questions that every student is required to answer.  These are the last three, referred to here as "An Image," “The Takeaway” and "The Tip of the Hat." Don't answer these until you've finished reading the book. Your answer to "The Takeaway" is your promise that you have read the entire book. 

As you are reading, underline any passages that you consider to be thought-provoking, insightful, or artfully expressed (unless you're reading a library copy, in which case, you may want to just make note). You may want to refer to one of the passages you have underlined in "The Takeaway."


As you are working through this webpage, pay attention to comments left by other students. You will offer a "tip of the hat" to the author that made the most thought-provoking comment.


As you are looking at the questions, pay attention to the image that accompanies each question set. For "The Image" question, you will be asked to identify one that you found most thought-provoking (and explain why you chose it).

After you've finished the book, be prepared to discuss it at the 2026 Honors Burkean Parlor, which will meet from 7-8:30 pm on Thursday, August 27th in the Chalmers Herman Theatre.


Note: Academic dishonesty of any kind (including the use of of AI to generate answers and not merely revise them) may result in expulsion from the program and loss of an Honors scholarship.


Questions are listed by the page on which related material appears.


1. Betrayal?

4. Critics
5. Goldilocks

6. Communal Dating

7. Right Behind You

12. On Sale Now: Another Life

22. Odd Couples

25. Stalker

38. New book, new self

46. Truth Pollution

53. Waiting rooms

59. Doors

60. And the winner is . . . 

63. Love languages

64. Cartesian Splits

72. The Villain

75. Tag Team

78. Survival of the Chickenest

85. Secret

87. You Look Marvelous

90. Listen

92. "Oops"

93. What's the point?

95. Inside Emotions

98. Hates

102. I am the roles I play?

108. Shall Remain Nameless

116. Lists and Letters

118. Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda

124. Gifts of Time

127. The Stories We Tell

128. Nooses

130. The Writing/Talking Cure

131. The heart wants

141. Irreversible

145. Owned

150. A giant ball of soul string mates

151. Wealth Gap

161. Begin/End

163. Thumbs Up/Down

177. Meeting Maggie

180. Blowing the 4.0

181. Unfeminist?

188. Who's there?

194A. Your urn

184B. Behind the curtain


These three are required (and don't count towards overall 750-word count total):

An Image

The Takeaway

The Tip of the Hat

1. Betrayal?

"A Bedtime Story" (1869) by Adolf Eberle

On the first page of the novel, the narrator describes her husband's habit of telling the children a bedtime story after she had already done so as "a small betrayal" (1).

Does that characterization seem fair to you? In what sense was it a "betrayal"?

Was her husband undermining her children's relationship with her? Was it a "betrayal" because he didn't talk to her about it? Or was it the children who were guilty of the "betrayal"?

Was she hurt because the nightly interaction took place when she wasn't in the room? Or was she hurt because her children didn't consider her funny?

If you have read further in the book, don't reference later events in your response.

4. Critics

"Lear and Cordelia" (1848) by Ford Madox Ford

On page 4, the narrator claims that "Your most cutting critics are always your children" (4). Do you agree? 

Would you characterize yourself or your siblings as your parents' "most cutting critics"?

Do you think a child's criticism of their parents is likely to be "cutting" because they know their parents best and are most likely to "hit the mark"? Or is it "cutting" because it seems ungenerous or ungrateful?

What determines when criticism is helpful and when it is cutting?

5. Goldilocks



What do you make of the narrator's comment about the under representation of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) characters in children’s literature, including the fact that "more books were published starring animals or inanimate objects than all the books about people of color combined" (5)?

Does your own reading experience corroborate that?

What effect might such a reduced presence have on readers?

Can you recommend a children's book whose main color is BIPOC?


6. Communal dating

Scene from "A Good Girl's Guide to Murder" (TV series; 2024-present)

According to the narrator, "when you first start dating someone, early communication is communal . . . When you're texting a woman, it's incredibly probable that you're talking not just ot her but to one or two of her closest friends as well" (6).

Do you think this is true?

Are women in general more likely to talk about sensitive details of their emotional and even physical experiences than men are? 

To what extent is this a good thing? How might it be seen as a negative?

7. Right Behind You

On page 7, the narrator makes the first of several references to a famous work by the renowned philosopher, Plato, namely, his “Allegory of the Cave.”

Are you familiar with Plato’s allegory? If not, check out the TED Ed Youtube video above.

Or click here to learn more.

The narrator asserts (in agreement with Plato) that the allegory shows that humans have a stubborn tendency to resist seeing “what’s lurking right behind us” (7).

What kind of things do you think people stubbornly avoid looking at? And why do they avoid them?