Saturday, June 20, 2015

Honors Summer Read 2015, The Rules of Engagement

"Woman Reading" (1970) by Will Barnet
Welcome to the ECU Honors Program's Enduring Questions website!  If you are enrolled in an Enduring Questions class for the fall semester of 2015 at ECU (EQ1 or EQ3), this website is for you.  Read on!

Responses to questions on this website are designed to generate "virtual conversation." By virtual, we do not mean something that looks like conversation but isn't. Instead, we mean REAL conversation in a virtual environment--this website.  And this fall, incoming first- and second-year Honors students will be engaged in the same discussion. Ten percent of each student's grade in both EQ1 and EQ3 will be based on your responses to the questions raised here.

The sort of conversation we're looking for is academic in character. Thus, your responses should consist of clear, concise statements of your ideas crafted in standard English (not text-speak--some of us are old!). They should be long enough to convey your thoughts, but short enough for other readers to read and respond to fairly quickly. In short, you don't want your responses to be so long that you monopolize (or kill) the conversation by going on, and on, and on.....(we all know how irritating that can be!).

Obviously, responses should not use profanity. They should be civil and respectful. People do not always agree. Responses can be critical; however, all communication is expected to be courteous and professional. Contributor's positions may be questioned; their character should not.

The object here is to reflect on some of the issues raised by the text, to connect the reading to your personal experience, and to help first- and second-year Honors students get to know each other better.

How and why was this particular book chosen?
The Honors Faculty started by reading reviews of popular, recently published books that address the gap between the Humanities and the Sciences. We presented three of these titles to Honors Students at the 2015 Spring caucus, where Honors students planning to take EQ3 in the fall voted on the one that looked best to them. Being Mortal was the winner.

When should I begin posting my responses?
As soon as you have read the opening pages of Being Mortal.

When is this assignment due?
This writing assignment is designed to be completed before classes begin.  Details about where and how to account for and submit your word count total will be provided in class when the semester starts.

How many questions should I respond to?
We do not expect you to respond to each question, but you should respond to several representing different sections of the book.

How much should I write?
Your responses should add up to a sum total of not less than 750 words.  Don't try to load up all 750 words into one or two comments.  You should also respond to comments left by other readers. And pose questions to other readers. (Check back later to see if anyone has responded to your comments-and respond to their responses.)  All of this writing will count toward your word total.  Students are responsible for keeping track of their word total (you can cut and paste your responses into a Microsoft Word document, which has a word count feature).  This is not just a writing assignment, though; it's a reading assignment, too.  Every student is responsible for reading every word of the assigned text.

Where do I post my responses?
At the bottom of each question post, you will find a "comment" link. If it has a "0" beside it, that means no one has commented yet; as more people comment, the number will go up. (Click here to see a list of all the chapters that have questions associated with them.) When you're ready to weigh in, click on the "comments" button, read any previous comments, and start writing. Please sign your posts. And use your real name--not a nickname--so we can get to know each other).

More questions?
E-mail us at sbenton@ecok.edu!

Engaging Being Mortal

In this post, you will find links to about several question sets about Atul Gawande's 2014 work of non-fiction, Being Mortal. These question sets are organized by chapter and are listed in the order in which the issues they address are raised by the text.

There's also a sandbox where you can raise own questions about the text that are not covered elsewhere (and answer those posed by others).  There's also other good stuff that doesn't directly lead to a question but that may enrich your engagement with the material.

Once you've started reading the chapters listed below (don't skip the introduction!), click on the links, read the corresponding questions and comments other readers may have left (click on the "comment" button beneath each post to see them), and then join the discussion (or initiate it).

There is only one question you are required to answer.  That's the last one, referred to here as "The Takeaway." Don't answer it until you've finished reading the book.

Atul Gawande
Introduction
Questions: 2A, 2B

Chapter One: The Independent Self
Questions: 11, 18

Chapter Two: Things Fall Apart
Questions: 30, 35-36, 49

Chapter Three: Dependence
Questions:  62

Chapter Four: Assistance
Questions: 75, 79, 95, 104

Chapter Five: A Better Life
Questions: 113, 116, 120, 126-127, 128

Chapter Six: Letting Go
Questions: 135, 139, 153, 167, 182, 187

Chapter Seven: Hard Conversations
Questions: 210, 230

Chapter Eight: Courage
Questions:  232, 238-239

The Sandbox
The Takeaway

Pity?

"Gerasim holds Ivan Ilyich’s legs willingly…" by Lilias Buchanan
“No one pitied him as he wished to be pitied . . . At certain moments after prolonged suffering he wished most of all (though he would have been ashamed to confess it) for someone to pity him as a sick child is pitied. He longed to be petted and comforted.”

--Leo Tolstoy, "The Death of Ivan Ilych."

Is the desire to be pitied a reasonable desire for a terminally ill person to have?
Or is the desire to be pitied promote helplessness?
If you were terminally ill would you want other people to pity you?

(Click here to read "The Death of Ivan Ilyich.")

My Culture Made Me Do It

"Child with a Puppet" (1903) by Henri Rousseau
Gawande suggests that Ivan Illyich’s desire to be pitied was reasonable and “the failure of those around Ivan Ilyich to offer comfort or to acknowledge what is happening to him was a failure of character and culture” (2).

To what extent do you think “culture” shapes our attitudes towards others, especially those who less fortunate than we are?

Is “mean-spiritedness” better understood as a personal quality, unique to individuals, or might we use such a term to describe society at large?

Might the society you grew up in be fairly characterized as lacking compassion in some way?

Ill

"The Ill Woman" (1886) by Vasily Polenov
Gawande reports that when he was growing up he “never witnessed serious illness or the difficulties of old age” (11).

What about you? Have you witnessed serious illness or the difficulties of old age? If so, can you describe the experience?

The wisdom of old timers

"Grandfather's Birthday, 1849" (1849) by Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller
“…the exclusive hold that elders once had on knowledge and wisdom . . . has eroded, thanks to technologies of communication—starting with writing itself and extending to the Internet and beyond. New technology also creates new occupations and requires new expertise, which further undermines the value of long experience and seasoned judgment. At one time, we might have turned to an old-timer to explain the world. Now we consult Google, and if we have any trouble with the computer we ask a teenager” (18).

Do you think schools have evolved sufficiently in response to technologies of communication?

If the value of long experience and seasoned judgment is less important now than it used to be, should we think of the authority of teachers differently than we do?

Should schools emphasize technology more and give less importance lectures given by “old timers” and information conveyed through old technologies (like books)?

Hand to hand

"Hand with Reflecting Sphere" (1935) by M. C. Escher
Gawande reports that “if you look carefully at the palm of an older person, at the base of the thumb, you will notice that the musculature is not bulging but flat” (30). In this and other ways he describes on pages 30 and 31, the aging process plays out in the hand.

Do you have a relationship with an older person who wouldn’t mind letting you examine his or her hand?

Talk to them about the effect the aging process has had on them. Share what you would like from that conversation.