Friday, June 27, 2014

Honors Summer Read, 2014: The Rules of Engagement

Welcome to the ECU Honors Program's Enduring Questions website!  If you are enrolled in an Enduring Questions class for the fall semester of 2014 at ECU (EQ1 or EQ3), this website is for you.  Read on!

"Reading a Story" (ca. 1879) by James Tissot
Responses to questions on this website are designed to generate "virtual conversation." By virtual, we do not mean something that looks like conversation but isn't. Instead, we mean REAL conversation in a virtual environment--this website.  And this fall, incoming first- and second-year Honors students will be engaged in the same discussion. Part of each student's grade in both EQ1 and EQ3 will be based on your responses to the questions raised here.

The sort of conversation we're looking for is academic in character. Thus, your responses should consist of clear, concise statements of your ideas crafted in standard English (not text-speak--some of us are old!). They should be long enough to convey your thoughts, but short enough for other readers to read and respond to fairly quickly. In short, you don't want your responses to be so long that you monopolize (or kill) the conversation by going on, and on, and on.....(we all know how irritating that can be!).

Obviously, responses should not use profanity. They should be civil and respectful. People do not always agree. Responses can be critical; however, all communication is expected to be courteous and professional. Contributor's positions may be questioned; their character should not.

The object here is to reflect on some of the issues raised by the text, to connect the reading to your personal experience, and to help first- and second-year Honors students get to know each other better.

How and why was this particular book chosen?
The Honors Faculty started by reading reviews of popular, recently published books that address the gap between the Humanities and the Sciences. We presented three of these titles to Honors Students at the 2014 Spring picnic and caucus, where Honors students planning to take EQ3 in the fall voted on the one that looked best to them.  The Storytelling Animal was the winner.

Are there any disclaimers I should be aware of before I begin reading the book?
Yes! No one who voted on this book had read the entire book before we chose it. It was only after we did so that we found out the coarse imagery the author deploys that the ideas he articulates that some may find quite offensive. Our choice of this book should not be interpreted as an endorsement of that imagery or the ideas expressed by the author. It is not the mission of ECU's Honors Program to promote the worldview of Jonathan Gottschall or any other particular author; we do, however, believe that students can benefit from engaging a variety of viewpoints, including the kind that are expressed by the author of The Storytelling Animal.

When should I begin posting my responses?
As soon as you have read the opening pages of The Storytelling Animal:  How Stories Make Us Human. Try to read the questions about each chapter before you read that chapter.

When is this assignment due?
This writing assignment is designed to be completed before classes begin.  Details about where and how to account for and submit your word count total will be provided in class when the semester starts.

How many questions should I respond to?
We do not expect you to respond to each question, but you should respond to several representing different sections of the book.

How much should I write?
Your responses should add up to a sum total of not less than 750 words.  Don't try to load up all 750 words into one or two comments.  You should also respond to comments left by other readers. And pose questions to other readers. (Check back later to see if anyone has responded to your comments-and respond to their responses.)  All of this writing will count toward your word total.  Students are responsible for keeping track of their word total (you can cut and paste your responses into a Microsoft Word document, which has a word count feature).  This is not just a writing assignment, though; it's a reading assignment, too.  Every student is responsible for reading every word of the assigned text.

Where do I post my responses?
At the bottom of each question post, you will find a "comment" link. If it has a "0" beside it, that means no one has commented yet; as more people comment, the number will go up. (Click here to see a list of all the chapters that have questions associated with them.) When you're ready to weigh in, click on the "comments" button, read any previous comments, and start writing. Please sign your posts. And use your real name--not a nickname--so we can get to know each other).

More questions?
E-mail us at sbenton@ecok.edu!

Engaging The Storytelling Animal

In this post, you will find links to about several question sets about Jonathan Gottschall's 2012 work of non-fiction, The Storytelling Animal:  How Stories Make Us Human. These question sets are organized by chapter and are listed in the order in which the issues they address are raised by the text.

There's also a sandbox where you can raise own questions about the text that are not covered elsewhere (and answer those posed by others).  There's also other good stuff that doesn't directly lead to a question but that may enrich your engagement with the material.

Once you've started reading the chapters listed below (don't skip the preface!), click on the links, read the corresponding questions and comments other readers may have left (click on the "comment" button beneath each post to see them), and then join the discussion (or initiate it).

There is only one question you are required to answer.  That's the last one, referred to here as "The Takeaway." Don't answer it until you've finished reading the book.

Jonathan Gottschall
Preface
Questions:  P.1, P 1.5, P.2. P.3

Chapter One: The Witchery of Story
Questions: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6

Chapter Two: The Riddle of Fiction
Questions: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3

Chapter Three: Hell is Story-Friendly
Questions:  3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4

Chapter Four: Night Story
Questions: 4.1

Chapter Five: The Mind is a Storyteller
Questions:  5.1, 5.2, 5.3

Chapter Six: The Moral of the Story
(This is the chapter some readers may find offensive--so prepare yourselves!)
Questions: 6.1. 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5

Chapter Seven: Ink People Change the World
Questions: 7.1, 7.2

Chapter Eight: Life Stories
Questions:  8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4

Chapter Nine: The Future of Story
Questions:  9.1, 9.2, 9.3

The Sandbox
The Takeaway

Preface 1: Primate writes Hamlet?

Gottschall writes that according to literary scholar Jiro Tanaka, "although Hamlet wasn't technically written by a monkey, it was written by a primate, a great ape to be specific. Sometime in the depths of pre-history . . . 'a less than infinite assortment of bipedal hominids split off from a non-quite infinite group of chimp-like australopithecines, and then another quite finite band of less hairy primates split off from the first motley crew of biped. And in a very finite amount of time, [one of] these primates did write Hamlet.'"  (xiii)

This is not the last time the subject of evolution will come up in the book.  Is this an important issue for you?  If so and you feel like weighing in, let us know why this an important issue for you.  If not and, again, you feel like weighing in here, let us know why.

And here's a related question: what does someone's opinion on evolution tell you about that person?

Preface 1.5: Notes Towards the Complete Works of Shakespeare


Watch the video and then characterize the value the film makers saw in this experiment. After you've done that, explain why you do or do not think this project is worthwhile.

Preface 2: Magic or Electrochemical Storms?

"Oak fractured by a lightning. Allegory on the artist wife's death" (1842) by Maxim Vorbiev.
According to Gottschall, "Fictions, fantasies, dreams . . . are, to the humanistic imagination, a kind of sacred preserve. They are the last bastion of magic. They are the one place where science cannot--should not--penetrate, reducing ancient mysteries to electrochemical storms in the brain or the timeless warfare among selfish genes" (xv-xvi).

This description suggests that those who do not have a "humanistic imagination"--scientists, perhaps?--are some kind of wonderless killjoys.  How might someone with a "scientific imagination" respond to that characterization?  How would you describe the appeal of the "scientific imagination"?  Does one or the other--science or the humanities--have a much stronger appeal to you?  How do you account for that appeal?  Do you think a certain kind of personality is drawn to one or the other?  Do you think our society is prejudiced in favor of the sciences or the humanities?

Preface 3: Stealing Cinderella

This is the music video referred to in the Preface. Seen it before? Did it have the same effect on you that it had on Gottschall? Can you recommend a different music video that tells a story that you found moving?

1.1: Transported?

"The Wreck of a Transport Ship" (c. 1810) by William Turner
On page 2, Gottschall describes the experience of being "transported" by story?  Is this an experience that you have had personally? If so, can you a describe a story that did the transporting?

And whether you've found yourself transported by story or not, you may want to weigh in on this question: What personal characteristics differentiate the kind of person who is easily transported by story from the person who is not?  In other words, what else could you probably guess would be true of each kind of person?