Thursday, June 20, 2013

Honors Summer Read, 2013: The Rules of Engagement

Welcome to the new website for Enduring Questions!  If you are enrolled in an Enduring Questions class for the fall semester at ECU (EQ1 or EQ3), this website is for you.  Read on!
"Literary reading" by Vladimir Makovsky (1866)
Responses to questions on this website are designed to generate "virtual conversation." By virtual we do not mean something that looks like conversation but isn't. Instead, we mean REAL conversation in a virtual environment--this website.  And this fall, for the first time, incoming first- and second-year Honors students will be engaged in the same discussion: 1/8th of every student's writing grade in both EQ1 and EQ3 will be based on their responses to the questions raised here.

The sort of conversation we're looking for is academic in character. Thus, your responses should consist of clear, concise statements of your ideas crafted in standard English (not text-speak--some of us are old!). They should be long enough to convey your thoughts, but short enough for other readers to read and respond to fairly quickly. In short, you don't want your responses to be so long that you monopolize (or kill) the conversation by going on, and on, and on.....(we all know how irritating that can be!).

Obviously, responses should not use profanity. They should be civil and respectful. People do not always agree. Responses can be critical; however, all communication is expected to be courteous and professional. Contributor's positions may be questioned; their character should not.

The object here is to reflect on some of the issues raised by the text, to connect the reading to your personal experience, and to help first- and second-year Honors students get to know each other better.

When should I begin posting my responses?
As soon as you have read the opening pages of Subliminal:  How Your Unconscious Minds Rules Your Behavior. After you've read later chapters, you can read the questions associated with them (don't respond to a question about chapter eight until you have read chapters one through seven).

When is this assignment due?
This writing assignment is designed to be completed before classes begin.  Details about where and how to account for and submit your word count total will be provided when the semester starts.

How many questions should I respond to?
We do not expect you to respond to each question, but you should respond to several representing different sections of the book.  There is only one post that everyone should respond to in order to get full credit for this assignment.  Click here to read it.

How much should I write?
Your responses should add up to a sum total of not less than 750 words.  Don't try to load up all 750 words into one or two comments.  You should also respond to comments left by other readers. And pose questions to other readers. (Check back later to see if anyone has responded to your comments-and respond to their responses.)  All of this writing will count toward your word total.  Students are responsible for keeping track of their word total (you can cut and paste your responses into a Microsoft Word document, which has a word count feature).  This is not just a writing assignment, though; it's a reading assignment, too.  Every student is responsible for reading every word of the assigned text.

Where do I post my responses?
At the bottom of each question post, you will find a "comment" link. If it has a "0" beside it, that means no one has commented yet; as more people comment, the number will go up. (Click here to see a list of all the chapters that have questions associated with them.) When you're ready to weigh in, click on the "comments" button, read any previous comments, and start writing. Please sign your posts. And use your real name--not a nickname--so we can get to know each other).

How will this affect my grade in Enduring Questions: Perspectives from Western Humanities and Enduring Questions:  Perspectives from the Sciences?
Your grade on this assignment will represent approximately 1/8th of your writing grade for the course.

More questions?
E-mail us at sbenton@ecok.edu!

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Engaging Subliminal

In this post, you will find links to about 50 question sets about Leonard Mlodinow's 2013 work of non-fiction, Subliminal:  How Your Unconscious Mind.  These question sets are organized by chapter and are listed in the order in which the issues they address are raised by the text.

There's also a sandbox where you can raise own questions about the text that are not covered elsewhere (and answer those posed by others).  There's also other good stuff that doesn't directly lead to a question but that may enrich your engagement with the material (you may have to read chapter six before you'll see the relevance of "Butt Slap, anyone?").

Once you've started reading the chapters listed below, click on the links, read the corresponding questions and comments other readers may have left (click on the "comment" button beneath each post to see them), and then join the discussion (or initiate it).

Chapter One:  The New Unconscious
1.1 , 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5
Chapter Two:  Senses Plus Mind Equals Reality
2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4
Chapter Three:  Remembering and Forgetting
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6
Chapter Four:  The Importance of Being Social
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4. 4.5
Chapter Five:  Reading People
5.1, 5.2, 5.3
Chapter Six:  Judging People by Their Covers
6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, "Butt Slap, anyone?"
Chapter Seven:  Sorting People and Things
7.1, 7.2
Chapter Eight:  In-Groups and Out-Groups
8.1, 8.2, 8.3
Chapter Nine:  Feelings
9.1, 9.2,
Chapter Ten:  Self
10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8
A Final Word of Caution
The Sandbox

Mlodinow: Behold the Man

Curious about what Dr. Mlodinow looks and sounds like? Wondering about how to pronounce his name? The video above--a talk Mlodinow gave in May of 2012 to the good folks at Google--is your path to enlightenment.

My Baby, My Cat (1.1)

"Man with a Cat and Woman with a Child" Marc Chagall (1914)
According to Mlodinow, the human "tendency to believe in consciously motivated behavior is so powerful that we read consciousness into not only our own behaviors but those of the animal kingdom as well" (12). We are particularly prone to anthropomorphize pets.

Have you personally witnessed animals displaying behavior that suggest human-like consciousness? Do you know anyone who attributes such human-like consciousness to their pets? Have you seen animal behavior that suggests a human-like consciousness Mlodinow has too casually dismissed? Or do you think Mlodinow is right that we attribute consciously motivated behavior to animals when it's not really there?

Alternatively--or additionally--can you describe any cases in which you have found yourself retroactively attributing conscious motivation to actions that were not necessarily conscious choices when you made them? Or, to put it in other words, have you ever acted instinctively and later found yourself characterizing your actions as conscious choices?

Human Pets

Framed (1.2)

"A Window on the Street" by John French Sloan (1912)
Mlodinow argues that all human beings "have implicit frames of reference . . . that produce habitual thinking and behavior," but we like ot think that "our experiences and actions . . . [are] rooted in conscious thought" (15).

Sometimes it is easier to see how someone else's experience and background might shape or skew their perception of the world. It can be more difficult to recognize the ways in which your own perception of the world might be shaped in similar ways.

Have you ever had an experience in which you came to realize that your frame of reference (your gender, family history, income level, etc.) was shaping your perception of the world, causing you to see things differently than someone else might? If another person were characterizing your frame of reference, what might they find identify as your potential "blind spots"?

Frames of Reference